Conference
25-26 April 2024
Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)
Deadline: 01/02/2024 at 00.00 (CET)
In the aftermath of the democratic transition of communist Europe, communist successor parties have emerged as major actors in the respective political scenes. Scholars of party politics have been interested in assessing their adaptation and survival strategies, as well as their ideological rebranding. Along with EU accession, research has later focused on Europeanization of party systems and political parties, measuring the effects of such a process on communist successors
Thirty years after the transition, communist successor parties still play a critical role in most of the region and represent one of the main legacies of the old Communist regimes. Formally defined as « leftists », successor parties represent nonetheless an extremely uneven party family: the Czech communists stick to Marxism-Leninism, while their Hungarian and Polish fellows are close to the political center; in Romania and Bulgaria, communist successors are catch-all parties– swinging between national conservatism and social democracy, while in Russia and Moldova they have embraced pragmatism and nationalism; elsewhere, and for instance in Latvia, they are relegated to represent the Russian ethnic minority. Albeit preponderant, communist successor parties are not the exclusive actors on the Left and are instead sided by restored pre-war social democratic parties – like in Czechia, second-generation successor parties – like in Slovakia, or new grassroots movement parties, mainly in former Yugoslavia
What is even more striking at a first glance is the high variance in the electoral performances of the Left, the main focus of the present call: in some cases, leftists are witnessing a steady and fast decline, such as in the Czech Republic (where no left-wing party is by now represented in Parliament), Hungary, Poland and Bulgaria; in Romania and Slovakia they represent instead the biggest political forces. The aim of this panel is to assess the reasons behind the crisis of the Left in Central and Eastern Europe and in the post-Soviet space. Emphasis on the comparative dimension of the question is encouraged, and in particular on the differences between the successful and the failing cases.
We welcome proposals touching one or more of the following points:
– Crisis of the Left: reasons and consequences.
– Reasons behind the success in part of the region.
– Eastern European party cleavages: is there no space for the Left in the fight between liberals and conservatives?
– The emergence of a new, progressive Left: social movements and movement parties.
Please send your abstract at Jean-Michel.De.Waele@ulb.be by 01/02/2024 (00.00 CET).
Scientific Committee: Jean-Michel De Waele - Professor of Political Science, CEVIPOL, Université Libre de Bruxelles Michel Perottino - Head of the Political Science Department, Charles University Sergiu Mișcoiu - Professor of Political Science, Thesis Director at University Babes-Bolyai (UBB) and Paris-Est (UPE), Director of the Centre for International Cooperation (UBB) Mark Marku - Director of the Communication and Journalism Department, University of Tirana Valentina Petrović - Postdoctoral researcher, University of Zurich Liutauras Gudžinskas - Associate Professor of Comparative Politics, Vilnius University Ivaylo Dinev - Centre for East European and International Studies (ZOiS) Gianmarco Bucci - Scuola Normale Superiore of Pisa (SNS)
OpenEdition vous propose de citer ce billet de la manière suivante :
AFEBALK (19 janvier 2024). The crisis of the Left in post-Communist Europe: reasons and consequences. AFEBalk. Consulté le 4 octobre 2024 à l’adresse https://doi.org/10.58079/vmot